Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 13:11
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
What is the best sunscreen for oily skin without a white cast?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
DePaul soccer player Chase Stegall dies in residence hall - Chicago Sun-Times
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Mysterious fast radio burst turns out to be from long-dead NASA satellite - Phys.org
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What is the best AI for interior designers?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Why would a spouse cheat if the marriage is good?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.